David Cone Did Not Look This Up

It’s the 6th inning in today’s Yankees-Royals game. There’s a Royal on second, two outs, and Mark Grudzielanek is at the plate. For about the sixth time today, broadcaster David Cone is heaping praise upon Grudzielanek in a manner consistent with the way most mediocre second basemen are praised. In other words, Cone is calling him a “professional hitter,” a “gamer,” a “leader,” “scrappy” and “underrated.” Fine.

Then Cone calls him “clutch in these situations.” I can only assume he’s talking about hitting with two outs and runners in scoring position. I can also assume that Cone did not look this up, because broadcasters never look up things like this. So I did just that.

For his career, Mark Grudzielanek has put up a .289/.332/.395 line, good for a 90 OPS+. This is not that good, which sort of dispels the notion that he is underrated. But that is not our concern. Our concern is whether or not Grudzielanek is actually better in these “clutch” situations, as Cone suggested.

With two outs and runners in scoring position, for his career, Grudzielanek has hit .250/.341/.330 for an 86 OPS+.

Mark Grudzielanek is just as bad in “clutch” situations as he is in regular situations, and David Cone did not look this up.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: